Skip to main content


You voted this lot in. All they know how to do is take from people with a little money. There are plenty of areas they could have raised the cash from, such as foreign aid, for example. This has nothing to do with the ยฃ22 billion black hole and everything to do with taking from citizens who have invested in their future. Anyone who voted for Labour should hang their heads in shame today.
bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y3n56eg9โ€ฆ
This entry was edited (2 months ago)


๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ?
Are they a deterrent? Punishment? Protecting Society? Rehabilitation? I'm wondering what releasing prisoners early tells offenders? "We were just kidding when we gave you your sentence. You do know you only have to serve a bit of it, don't you?"
bbc.co.uk/news/live/c62rygz20gโ€ฆ
in reply to Adam Dalliance

So, how long of a given sentence do you think someone should serve? A day? A week? A month? What is the point of giving someone twelve months custodial if they know there's a chance they could be released within two or three months? And given how tariffs work, they could be out within a month once "Time served on remand" has been taken into account.

I blame ALL governments for not investing in 'capacity' within the UK, including the NHS and education. The population has exploded since the '60s to 80 Million, and we're still stumbling along with a capacity of 53 Million; there are only so many eggs you can squeeze in a box before they start cracking.

in reply to dick_turpin

Length of sentence depends on circumstances of course, and then on behavior inside.

I get the impression that sentence-inflation is much of the cause of the overcrowding. Keep making sentences longer without building more capacity with no indication that doing so has any good effect on actual crime levels.

Not investing in the country and all the austerity since the banking crisis in 2008 does seem to have broken just about everything.



While I can fully understand the parents' pain and distress caused by questioning Lucy Letby's conviction, I would have hoped they would want the truth and not what appears to be, on the face of it, a very thin case. I'm unsure if an accusation of "Well, according to the rotas, you were always on duty when incidents happened!" is proof of guilt. Now, eminent professors are starting to question the medical evidence.

news.sky.com/story/lucy-letby-โ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

There does seem to be increasing momentum backing her grounds for appeal. However I have a slight problem with her scribbled journals 'I am evil', 'May God forgive me' etc. Now she claims this was part of 'counselling'.
in reply to andyc

People say strange things about themselves in dark moments of personal crisis.

Here's a simple question: Have you ever rubber-necked a crash on the motorway? Have you ever been disappointed that the collision wasn't horrific and just looked like a bad shunt? Does that mean you are a killer? I would argue not. People do lots of things that that with hindsight may not be the best of ideas. Does looking at Best Gore (The site is gone now, thank The Pond Gods) make one a serial killer? The trouble is, the police and courts would say, "Ah! See what he was looking at? He must be guilty." the same can be said for her diary; it fits the narrative, but that doesn't mean it's proof.

I would argue we've seen an erosion of: "Beyond reasonable doubt." over the years in favour of the Vera syndrome: "Com on, you did it!" ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

in reply to andyc

My daughter (The Nurse) is convinced she's guilty.

"Come on, Dad, She's very strange. She sent love letters to a Consultant!"

Oh, so infatuation is proof of committing infanticide, is it? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

in reply to dick_turpin

Hmm. I hope she never gets called for jury service :-)

in reply to dick_turpin

Oh, nice, didn't know that existed. Look forward it it ๐Ÿ‘


"I don't mean to be rude."
"Don't take this the wrong way."
"With the greatest of respect."

Have you noticed that when people make that statement, they proceed to rip you to bits after playing what they believe is a "Get out of jail" card?
#politics #winterfuel #labour
youtube.com/watch?v=RwxW3beZ8Pโ€ฆ

reshared this

in reply to dick_turpin

Translation:

"I don't mean to be rude." - I couldnโ€™t care less what you think or say, Iโ€™ll do and say what I want
โ€จ"Don't take this the wrong way."- - I couldnโ€™t care less what you think or say, Iโ€™ll do and say what I want
โ€จ"With the greatest of respect." - I couldnโ€™t care less what you think or say, Iโ€™ll do and say what I want

And those using these phrases think were daft enough not to know what they mean.

in reply to Richard

"I don't mean to be rude, but I'm gonna be." ๐Ÿคฃ


Right, let's see if all those who bitched and moaned about #Rwanda complain with the same outrage over this?
#DoubleStandards
theguardian.com/society/articlโ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.

in reply to Adam Dalliance

See, that is the greatest lie of the 21st century. While some of the initial countries, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, and possibly even Turkey, might be a bit dangerous for them, you can't possibly believe Hungary, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, and France or Germany, Belgium, and France are not "Safe Countries" for a fleeing Afghan?

I watched a programme the other day documenting how numerous towns across Italy are welcoming migrants in the hope of reanimating dead towns and villages. Yet, thousands ignore that option and race for Calais.

While many migrants may have family in the UK, that doesn't mean they get an automatic right to come here. It is obvious why Britain is the destination of choice. I wonder what would happen if the welfare state was abolished?

in reply to dick_turpin

I didn't say anything about the safety of those countries.

Are you under the impression that there's some international rule saying people fleeing war have to stop at the first safe place they come to?

That rule doesn't exist, and it would be madness if it did, forcing the fleeing population to bunch up on the borders instead of spreading out around the world.

Scotland also wants immigrants, the UK is in dire need of immigrants because the population is old and retiring.

Most immigrants don't pick the UK, and those that do usually do so because of the language I suspect. That and Only Fools And Horses.

If they are under the impression we have a particularly generous welfare state they soon find they are mistaken.



My daughter brought me back some of @JeremyClarkson's pigs.

dick_turpin reshared this.



Now, all that's needed is correspondence to come to light from the letting agents to Jas Athwal informing him of the state of some of the fifteen properties he (and a family member) owns in and around Ilford.
#RogueLandlords #Labour

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crkm15โ€ฆ



Hey! @angryearthling, I haven't forgotten you. In fact, for some reason, I was thinking about you this morning. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

dick_turpin reshared this.



Now, of course, there will be those who lack the skills to debate this issue who will declare this as the rise of racism, but I'm sorry to burst your bubble; racism only has a minute part to play in all this. There is a genuine concern about the mass immigration to Europe, and from what I can see, governments are too scared to do anything about it for fear of being accused of being, wait for it, racist. And so 'The people' feel they have no course but to contemplate extreme options because their current leaders are not listening to them.
#immigration #politics #far-right #change
news.sky.com/story/germany-farโ€ฆ

Politics Feed reshared this.



Well, that's a new one. Queuing just to get on to the Ticketmaster website! Never mind trying to buy any #Oasis tickets. I'm not even bothering to try.

dick_turpin reshared this.

in reply to dick_turpin

I hope they have insurance included, guess the bets about the cancellations must be crazy right now. .


Daughter is currently spending all her nurse's pay at @JeremyClarkson's #HawkstonBrewery, and then tomorrow, she'll spend what's left at Diddly Squat Farm shop. Christ! Kaleb Cooper looks about 12 in that picture!

dick_turpin reshared this.



Today is 'Pay Day' for most of us. Get and spend it while you can because fairly soon, #Labour will make sure you have nothing in your wallet.
#politics

reshared this



After a five year hiatus, OggCamp is back in 2024!
Ken Fallon of ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ผ interviews Gary Williams about rebooting the OggCamp event.
hpr4197:: hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4โ€ฆ

reshared this



When it was announced, I was mad keen to see if I could get tickets for Wembley, but the press has successfully put me off the idea with its avalanche of "Ooh! The tickets will be so expensive AND THAT'S IF YOU CAN GET ANY!"
in reply to penguin42

Dunno, tickets go on sale tomorrow but hotels and stuff are pricey.


This demonstrates that Kier Starmer has no backbone if he's intimidated by a painting of a dead former prime minister.
#Politics

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/โ€ฆ

Politics Feed reshared this.



One of the joys of being the 'New' in any situation is the ability to blame those who held the reins before. "Don't blame us! We inherited it." Of course, the beauty of that is that you can slip in some of your unpalatable ideas, and everyone will continue to blame the predecessor.
ft.com/content/c290309b-7aa3-4โ€ฆ
#Labour #Politics #TheMoneyIsAllGone

reshared this



Clearly, the government has never heard of the domino effect.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ: "It's all falling apart, they're rioting in the streets!"
๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ: "We'll lock 'em all up!"
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ: "But the prisons are full!"
๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ: "We'll keep 'em locked up in police cells!"
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ: "Nobody is being arrested because there's nowhere to keep them!"
๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ: "Did we send Bibby Stockholm back yet?"
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyvpj7โ€ฆ
#labour
in reply to dick_turpin

They always arrest the latest criminals and let the ones who have been there awhile free.

Then six months later those are back with a trail of blood of their victims.



I would be speechless if it weren't for the fact this type of thinking doesn't surprise me; in fact, it shows that it's not capitalists and Tories you need to worry about but socialists!

Clive Lewis #Labour MP, would like to see a government-run social media platform
https://x.com/labourlewis/status/1824843448299512191

This has nothing to do with 'Freedom' or 'Protection' but everything to do with Control. Making sure you are only exposed to acceptable ideas and opinions. Read through the comments on the ๐• post. Some of those who favour the idea are beyond belief! If they hate ๐• so much, why are they still using it? One or two even have paid accounts!

๐—œ๐—ณ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜, ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜!

๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ



Hmm? So it would seem #Labour is not interested in determining why some sections of the UK are unhappy or finding ways to bring harmony to the population. Apparently, the answer is to find more ways to shut people up and get them to toe the line.

If you ask me, the right to "Free speech" is being eroded on a daily basis.

That doesn't mean I agree with rioting etc. before some poorly educated, inarticulate cretin jumps in. I'm more concerned about governments controlling what we are allowed to say.

First They Came โ€“ by Pastor Martin Niemรถller (Edited)

First, they came for the demonstrators, but I did not speak out because I was not a demonstrator.

Then they came for the Facebook and ๐• users, and I did not speak out because I was not a controversial poster.

Then, they came for the pubgoers because of what they spoke about, and I did not speak out because I didn't visit pubs.

Then they came for my neighbour and I did not speak out because he played music too loud.

Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me.

news.sky.com/story/home-secretโ€ฆ



See! Give in to one, and they all expect you to give in to them, too!
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg49vโ€ฆ
#Labour #TheMoneyIsAllGone


"๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜?"
43 days ago, you bought a 2nd hand car. Today, the brakes failed; you killed four people. You get arrested, convicted and imprisoned because it's your car. The fact the previous owner never maintained the breaks is no defence. #Labour



Whether you like Liz Truss or not or feel "she crashed the economy," she's invited to be interviewed, where, hopefully, you might hear her side of the story. Yet an individual with the maturity of a six-year-old pulls a stunt and thinks it's clever.

How are we going to learn from all the mistakes the Conservatives made if every time there's an opportunity to call them to account, some cretin goes for social media air-time?
#cabbage #LizTruss

theguardian.com/politics/articโ€ฆ



I had to do some searching to find this. I wonder why it's not more prominent in today's news stories? ๐Ÿค”

Employment up by 2% is huge. There are 37.5 Million people of working age in the UK, with 33.09M as of June 2024 now in some form of employment.

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l100โ€ฆ



So #labour and Kier Starmer have succeeded in scaring UK ๐• users into silence with 118 prison sentences handed out some of which are related to people making posts on Social Media. In the good old days, you could talk bollocks in a pub nowadays, you'll get two years for making an inaccurate post. ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐—•๐—•

insidetime.org/newsround/goverโ€ฆ

stannard reshared this.

in reply to dick_turpin

Your post is inaccurate. There have been no new laws on this since the election. Online safety act is from last year. I wonder who came up with that.

Musk could be guilty of such crimes himself.

in reply to dick_turpin

Well the courts will act based on existing laws that were not added by this government. How do you think the previous lot would have handled this? Some of them have gone very quiet.

I've not heard of anyone being banged up for chatting down the pub.

in reply to dick_turpin

just wondering why you're blaming the current government. Were you concerned when peaceful protesters for dragged away by police in recent years? I get that you are looking for ways to bash them. Hey, that's your free speech that's legal.
in reply to Steve

For the third and final time, where does it say "New Law"?
in reply to dick_turpin

you're like a stuck record. It was implied in what you said. How else does a government control what the courts do? I'm waiting for Farage to get charged.

Anyway, things seem to have quietened down a bit now thugs and keyboard warriors are getting banged up. Maybe it works.

in reply to Steve

No, you are wrong, but refuse to admit it. And don't presume to tell people what they infer.
in reply to dick_turpin

We can disagree on who is wrong. We each have our axes to grind and have a global platform these days rather than just who's in the pub. If you put stuff out then expect to have it scrutinised and interpreted in various ways.

I see a lot less now I'm off Twtr. Maybe I should stop following you here. It may be better for my mood.

in reply to Steve

I would have said it's a free country, but now that Starmer has told Mark Rowley to go after anyone, be they rioters or people posting on Facebook, it's not as free as it once was.

The laws have been in place since 2012, and while a few convictions have resulted from them over the years, they have not been enforced as severely as they are currently being implemented.

To be clear, every rioter deserves all they get, although I'm not sure a 12-year-old boy and 13-year-old girl deserve the full force of the law. Youthful exuberance springs to mind. What next? Shipment off to a re-education camp?

I'm not overly keen on a custodial sentence for something written on social media. I remember seeing the phrases Ubuntu and Rape being used in a post a few years back. Should the author get 18 Months for that? It seems to me sections of society want to pick and choose. There's a reason Lady Justice has a blindfold: the justice she dispenses is fair and equal to all.

in reply to Steve

@steevc
'How do you think the previous lot would have handled this ?'

Funnily enough, the Tories handled the 2011 riots in exactly the same way (rapid prosecutions). A tactic that Kier Starmer has successfully re-used.

theguardian.com/uk/2012/jul/03โ€ฆ

in reply to andyc

@andyc Exactly and they enacted the online bill. If Starmer had done less he'd be called 'weak' by the right, so he can't win. Politics is not a zero sum game for us citizens. We all want a peaceful and just society.
in reply to Steve

@steevc @dick_turpin

I think the pertinent point here is why can't they shift, recruit resources and cut the time for asylum claims to reduce the massive waiting list which, in turn, leads to the need to house people on a temporary basis until their claim is ruled on.

Source: instituteforgovernment.org.uk/โ€ฆ

in reply to andyc

@steevc @dick_turpin

Sorry - by 'they' I lay the blame at the previous incumbents, not Labour necessarily.

in reply to dick_turpin

Mark Meechan was sent to jail for posting on social media in 2018. He make his girlfriends dog do hitler salutes and filmed it for instagram. So we don't really even need the tories most recent round of censorship laws to imprison folks for social media jokes.

The country marches towards authoritarianism whichever party is in power.



Hold the phone! The Labour government can suddenly find the capacity to lock up rioters and yet hasn't the room to lock up shoplifters and burglars.

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2nnjโ€ฆ



Oh, here we go! I await someone to respond: "In that case, Burka's should be banned!" ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202โ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

does something make you think there's a bunch of racists out there? I'm not aware that balaclavas are part of any religion.


There really are some dumb fucks on Social Media. The worst ones are those who think they're intelligent!

"๐˜๐˜ง ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜จ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ด, ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ. "

Aren't all our prisons full? Isn't that why Starmer plans to release people early? Where are you going to house all these rioters? Oh, I know, The Bibby Stockholm is available now, isn't it? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

in reply to Steve

Anyone who does not come via our Customs system is illegal, period. There is no argument or justification anyone can put to me to change my belief in that regard.

Nobody said you said anything? I was hoping you could explain the distinction to me.

I would argue that Starmer's current actions are borderline fascist. He's not ordered water cannons onto the streets. He's not offered some form of arbitration bringing 'community leaders' together; he just appears to have brought out the cosh. Which also seems to be weilded towards only one side of the argument.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to dick_turpin

Why should I explain something I never proposed? The twitterati seem to spout random opinions.

What are the sides in this argument? People who are attacking the police, torching cars, trying to burn down hotels and other violent acts need to be stopped and deterred. They don't seem interested in arbitration when they turn up with beer and masks.

Do we have water cannons? Johnson bought some that were never used.

I fear someone will be killed. That would be tragic.



This is Labour's classic incompetence. They cancel things like the Bibby Stockholm barge and the Rwanda plan without offering the general public an alternative solution.

Now, there will be those who will say, "That's got nothing to do with it!" But it has everything to do with it. Southport was simply the lancing of the boil that has been building for a good few years now. I'm also uneasy about simply labelling this unrest as "far right." There's massive unhappiness on all sides. The government needs to look at treating the symptoms and not the easiest route of swiftly cutting an arm or leg off, hoping that stops the patient from complaining.

ft.com/content/a6f39365-8f2a-4โ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

Ah come on, that's crap - I mean sure labour need to figure out a sane plan for that lot; but these riots are the combination of a) Taking advantage of a tragedy on purpose b) Drunks in hot weather c) and the strange coincidence of it being the same week the EDL leader left the country to avoid a court hearin.
in reply to penguin42

Most civil unrest is started by incidents that bear little relation to the main thrust. The problem these days is that one has to be very careful of what words are used, mainly because people's emotions are on a hair trigger.

I do not disagree with some of what you said; however, I do think a larger portion of the UK than folk are willing to admit are at the end of the road with illegals, and they are illegal if they don't come through customs. People feel marginalised and frankly shat on. I get it when young folk have no job or a chance of getting a council house, let alone a mortgage, and they see videos on ๐• of people in hotels getting three square meals and all the support they need.

I totally agree. This is mindless thuggery, and yes, there may well be elements of right-wing influence, but to believe that's all it is is naive or, at the very least, too simple an answer. I honestly believe the problems run deeper than just simple racism.

in reply to dick_turpin

I don't disagree with there are people feeling alienated - but purposely feeding on that with a nasty tragedy is terrible.
No one has a clue what to do with the illegal immigration though - and it's not just UK, most of the media don't point to the same conversations happening all around Europe.
in reply to penguin42

Mistakes have been made on illegal immigration. If you are seeking asylum you don't dump your ID in the channel and come into the UK undocumented.

And, as a new government, you don't just give an amnesty to 90,000 illegal migrants without checking it's safe to do so. I know there must be some hiding in the countryside who dodged Border Force and entered unchallenged.

There is so much going wrong in our country now. A neighbour witnessed Shoplifters from London arriving by train, at our station, emptying supermarket shelves unchallenged and hopping on a train back to London. When train station staff were informed of it they said "Yeah, they've got it down to a fine art" and the police are totally disinterested.

in reply to Neil Darlow :gotosocial: :silverblue: :xmpp:

@neil To be clear; I'm not saying everything is good - I agree there's a lot of stuff screwed up; just no point justifying these riots from that.
in reply to penguin42

The riots can't be justified. They're executed by organised actors I believe. There are grievances which have been exploited by the rioters I agree. But as Pete said, the underlying grievances need addressing and the government listening to the people would be a good start.
in reply to penguin42

๐Ÿ’ฏ
That's what I've been moaning about for months. Our news, especially the BBC, is so biased and geared to only allowing left-wing stories that the British public is unaware European countries have walls of barbed wire and are shipping their illegals to Morroco and Algeria. I suspect an illegal would rather be shipped to Rwanda than Algeria! And yet, the woke brigade managed to successfully sabotage the program through disinformation and shaming.
in reply to penguin42

Wrong on a few fronts there too:

The EDL hasn't been a thing in over 10 years and Tommy Robinson has nothing to do with whatever might be left of it.

The police detained him for the allowed 6 hours permitted by the anti-terror legislation they arrested him under. He was released without charge unconditionally and he went on holiday with his family as he had arranged prior. He didn't leave by secret means and flew out of the country like anyone else.

There is no arrest warrant awaiting him for not attending a fictitious court hearing. This is all a fabrication of the lefty media.

in reply to Neil Darlow :gotosocial: :silverblue: :xmpp:

@neil Hmm; so I don't know all of the details of that - but the BBC is listing a specific contempt of court case at the High Court last Monday that he was supposed to attend; bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjerxdโ€ฆ
in reply to penguin42

Don't know about what the BBC are reporting, they're not a trustworthy news outlet. The description of that court case seems a bit flimsy "Repeating something he said about a Syrian which he'd been told not to"?
in reply to Neil Darlow :gotosocial: :silverblue: :xmpp:

I heard it was a video he was not allowed to show, which he duly showed yet again (I presume on ๐•?) Of course, the key question should be, is this video (which I have not seen) fictitious, or is it that the video would stir up trouble? If it's the latter, I wonder if that's "suppression of freedom of speech"? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

I have no time for Tommy Robinson, but it's a stretch to say he's behind these riots, which I've seen promoted on ๐• throughout today.

in reply to Neil Darlow :gotosocial: :silverblue: :xmpp:

@neil While I don't trust the Beeb that much, I don't think they're just going to make up the court case - I'm not sure how big a deal the case is; but surely it fits with this stuff - lieing to stoke up trouble by claiming everything is due to illegal immigrants (of which some is, some isn't - but don't lie about it!)
in reply to penguin42

I think that's the key right there. There are mistakes on both sides, but the biggest mistake is not accepting that there are sides and differences. Where we go wrong is believing we are all homogenous, but we're not. We can all rub along nicely so long as there's an equilibrium. Sadly, at the moment, there's not, and that's why everyone is up in arms.
in reply to penguin42

My biggest concern about this "court case" is the warrant being issued but the judge saying not to act on it until October so that Robinson my choose to attend voluntarily. Something's off there.

I don't believe that Tommy Robinson is behind these riots. He's spent a lot of time recently reporting inequalities in the law and urging those attending his rallies to behave lawfully and respectfully. It's also worth noting that all demographics of society have been present at those rallies.




And so the "Nows our chance to get lots of money" begins.

news.sky.com/story/gps-vote-toโ€ฆ



If you dislike something that much, do us all a favour and fuck off, leave, cancel, close, delete, unsubscribe, don't keep hanging around bitching about it. You're simply proving that, in fact, you can't be without it. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ


This cartoon is 'spot on' regarding the truth about these pension raids proposed by Racheal Reeve.
#politics #Labour

Politics Feed reshared this.



Remember children. You voted this lot in.

Winter fuel payments will now be means tested.

Never mind whose fault it is. Taking money from vulnerable pensioners can't be right?
#Labour
bbc.co.uk/news/live/c3g9yy73l7โ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

The 'review of new hospital program' seems even wrose; of course they'll point out it's not the 'vulnerable' pensioners....
in reply to dick_turpin

So a couple of people have said to me, "They've got plenty of money!" (i.e. pensioners) Even the wife said, "Have you seen all the pensioners in Marks & Spencer?"

My response is the same as Jeremy Clarkson's. "So, in other words, you work hard all your life and put some money aside so that your retirement, where you have no other income other than your pension, is slightly more comfortable and along comes a group of people who notice you have a couple of quid and take it off you to give to some workshy layabout. And they call that socialism."

I'm not angry because I already knew this was the kind of thing Labour does and will always do. The Labour Party may well change its outward appearance, but at its core, the only idea they have is to take from one to give to another. Labour's idea of 'growth' is to increase the size of public employees so that:
A. There are more union members.
B. Employment and wage increases are guaranteed.

#RantOver



That's his days numbered as Director of the FBI.
independent.co.uk/news/world/aโ€ฆ


Well, that's their cards marked!
#politics #Labour #democracy
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c978m6โ€ฆ

reshared this



There's going to be lots of unhappy residents up and down the country.
I can see it now: "Why must they come here? This is not what I voted Labour for! Getting free houses........" ๐Ÿคฃ

news.sky.com/story/bibby-stockโ€ฆ



Not sure how you're going to get the money back? Purchases are covered under legal transactions. If only these things were as simple as Labour makes out.
#politics #Labour #money
https://x.com/RachelReevesMP/status/1815672962244018326

Politics Feed reshared this.



The solution to this Rental problem is to make it illegal to offer properties for rent that are mortgaged, and only accommodation wholly owned by the landlord can be rented or leased.

This has two effects
1. The landlord is forced to offer reasonable rents because around 90% of the figure will be total profit.

2. Fewer homes will be purchased because tenants will no longer pay the landlord's mortgage, thus increasing the stock of available houses for purchase. In the long term, this will bring house prices down as more choices will be available.
#Renting #Landords #Housing #ukgovernment

'๐—œ ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป ยฃ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ,๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜† ๐—ฎ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ'
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7209lโ€ฆ

reshared this

โ‡ง