Skip to main content


Well, that's hysterical. I wonder if Unite will ask for their ยฃ10K back?

TBH, I'm in a bit of a quandary about this. On the one hand, I admire her resolute stand. On the other hand, isn't she stabbing her comrades in the back?

I don't like the woman anyway, so for me, she's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't.
theguardian.com/politics/2025/โ€ฆ



So resident doctors are paid ยฃ38,800 a year, and they want a 29% pay rise, which is an additional ยฃ11,252 a year, taking them to ยฃ50,052. There are around 71,000 resident doctors currently in the UK, which means #Labour will need to find ยฃ798.892,000 to pay for it. So the question is: What drugs are you willing to give up to pay for it? What welfare payments? What other public money can they claw back to pay for this?

I await some wanker to post "TAX THE RICH!" apparently the rich are only 1% of the population so I love how dumbarses think the rich can pay for everything, just like they expect the state to pay for everything.
theguardian.com/society/2025/jโ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

Your 1% figure doesn't make sense without comparing what amount of money those 1% own compared to the 99%.
in reply to Thomas

It's irrelevant unless you believe that 1% has more money than the government.

This is where that argument falls down. It's not about "He has more money than me so he should give more!" It's about how many calls are there on the public purse. I want to live in a country with no or very little tax. The UK is the most heavily taxed country in the world. We pay tax on our earnings, tax every year to own a car, and are taxed every time we put fuel in the car. We're taxed if we buy a burger. We're taxed again and again on just about everything, even though we've already paid tax on what we earned. Pensioners are taxed if their income is above the personal allowance, which is currently ยฃ12,570, and if you've tried to build a little nest egg with savings or an ISA you'll be a target for the taxman. It's no wonder the so-called rich try to find legal ways to avoid tax. There'll be nothing left after all the people with their hands out have finished.

in reply to dick_turpin

It doesn't actually cost anything like that though. This is the myth of thinking of government finance like a household or a business.

A third of that money comes immediately back to the exchequer as income tax those doctors pay. 20% of most of the rest comes back as VAT on whatever the doctors spend the money on. A third of what remains comes back in income tax on whoever receives the money the doctors spend.

Within half a dozen transactions pretty much all of the money is already back at the government in increased tax receipts.

We should surely tax the rich, but we don't need to do so in order to pay doctors.

in reply to Adam Dalliance

This is also why austerity fails completely. Every pound the government "saves" in spending results in lower tax receipts from less money in the economy and a poorer citizenry. Saving money costs you money and spending money increases your tax receipts.

Government economics is not like a household or a business.

in reply to Adam Dalliance

I'll concede that they'll [potentially] get a third back through direct taxation, but the financial commitment will still increase above the current level. Your idea that they'll get the rest back via VAT, etc, is potentially wishful thinking. Not everyone drinks, drives or buys cakes.

Home economics does work; Thatcher proved that.

A cut in government spending doesn't decrease tax revenue unless a redundant public sector worker fails to secure another job. Then again, austerity doesn't have to mean job cuts; there are plenty of commitments that can be shelved that have no bearing on revenue income.

I don't think we need austerity at the moment; what we do need is to keep expenditure under control.

in reply to dick_turpin

The money in the economy is created by government spending. If you reduce government spending you reduce the money supply which shrinks the economy and reduces tax receipts.

It is true that if the junior doctors horde their money in offshore bank accounts instead of spending it in the UK then it won't be taxed.



You do realise this only works for those picked up by the UK coastguard, don't you? All those who manage to wade ashore and disappear into their communities won't be sent back unless caught by immigration. This isn't even a plaster on the problem, it's more like a stitch!
#StopAtSource

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx24d7โ€ฆ



This'll be funny at election time when they have one of those presidential campaign debates.
theguardian.com/technology/202โ€ฆ



Wow, just wow. If you voted #Labour you saddled us with these useless amateurs for another four years unless something happens. Do you think this is a good look for our country? The pound is down, interest rates on borrowing are up, and the markets are nervous because our chancellor started blarting in public!

That coward Starmer has bent over and U-turned on pretty much every announcement since becoming Prime Minister, what a pathetic, useless government we have.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c307zvโ€ฆ



If there's all this uproar over AI I wonder what the reaction will be when they announce they have perfected the ability to upload brain patterns?
#Bobiverse


I'm confused. All these people convicted for posts they made on Social Media, mostly under the Communications Act 2003 and yet Bob Vylan won't be charged even though his comments were transmitted, and some group called Kneecap will not be charged over encouraging fans to kill their MP!
theguardian.com/music/2025/junโ€ฆ

belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertaโ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.



This makes me puke, it really does. If this were the #Conservatives, the internet would be aflame with derision and calls for the PM to go, yet this backsliding wimp still hangs on. But here's the more important question. If Labour is not going to cut the Winter fuel allowance, and is not going to recoup any money from the enormous benefits bill. Where is the money coming from to pay for all these manifesto promises?

P.S. How many houses have been built? I suspect that's another objective that this smoke-and-mirrors #Labour government hasn't achieved.
#Politics

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx240nโ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.



So, Backslider Starmer has done yet another U-turn, this time over the gravy train that is PIP. What sort of party did you all vote for that when it starts to get a bit rough, its leadership surrenders? Let's hope the Russians don't start threatening us.
news.sky.com/story/government-โ€ฆ


So, not only is the Argon Eon no longer seeing the drives, it now says Network N/A, and I can't see it on the network.

The network should still work, the #raspberrypi boots, and the OLED works.

This is pretty annoying, as it was ยฃ140

#Argon40

dick_turpin reshared this.

in reply to dick_turpin

That doesn't mean a thing unless it's delivering the proper output. Will the network work if you disconnect the drives (except for the boot drive!)?
in reply to bls

The drive (the first one in the image) has failed. I must have messed up the install by logging into the Pi and trying to investigate from there rather than logging into the OMV UI. Cut a long story short, after a fresh install, it's working, although I need to get another 2TB drive and rebuild the RAID1.


I'm so angry I could explode! Not at the 1000 illegals, but all those deluded sheep who derailed every solution the Tories put forward. Accused the Conservatives of every racist crime under the sun for trying to do something about it, the #press and the Internet raged against the #Conservatives, and now that #Labour has lost control, nobody says a word. Why is that? Is it because nobody can say a bad thing about Labour? Whatever happened to accountability?
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyqzeโ€ฆ


๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ let anyone out or turn when you're driving. You can guarantee the arse-wipe you let out will be driving a roadsweeper refitted with a reasonably decent car body. Failing that, they'll drive 100 yards down the road and will want to turn right, holding you up again! Then there's that aomeba who is waiting to turn right across the front of you, only there's someone who wants to come out of that turning, which means the two of them are now sitting there and playing: "After you, no after you, no after you, no after you." while you sit bollocking yourself for attempting to do a good deed for the day.

dick_turpin reshared this.



Is the @BBCNews determined to see the driver of the car in Liverpool murdered? Because they seem to be pouring petrol on the story on an almost hourly basis. Maybe they're upset that it's not been labelled a terrorist attack?
bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5yqp4yp88โ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.



That should make @JeremyClarkson happy.
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/โ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.



For crying out loud's sake!
๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜€
Seems my #Friendica is not broken. Now, all I need is to find out is that all the tokens I reset no longer work. #LeSigh

dick_turpin reshared this.



So basically, the UK is paying France for French police to stand on the beach and watch their problem leave French shores for the UK. You brokered a cracking deal there, #Labour. What's your response, @Keir_Starmer? I know, the easy, lazy option of cracking down on LEGAL immigration, taking everyone's attention away from the illegal.

Fighting the gangs my arse. You need to stop the boats!
telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/1โ€ฆ



Seriously? You want us to believe Kier Starmer doesn't know who Enoch Powell was!
theguardian.com/politics/live/โ€ฆ


And this is called: "Government Misdirection" It's not legal immigration that's the problem, although it probably needs an overhaul. It's the illegal immigration that they need to address. By doing this, #Labour hopes to shut everyone up complaining about "All these bleedin' foreigners"

In my book, anyone who wants to come to the UK and pay tax is more than welcome. It's all the fighting-age men landing on the Kent coast who are not.

theguardian.com/politics/live/โ€ฆ

reshared this



So let me get this right. He sticks two fingers up at the UK, calls us all racist, even though there's a video of him in his younger days being racist, and didn't he attend a party wearing a swastika? He flounces off to America, telling Oprah that he couldn't get any help with his mental welfare while conveniently forgetting he was the head of a mental health charity. He takes the UK government to court to get them to pay for his security if and when he decides to visit us, and when that doesn't work, he tells everyone he wants to be friends with his dad after slagging King Charles off to anyone who will listen.

Have I missed anything?

theguardian.com/commentisfree/โ€ฆ



Is mastodon.org.uk broken? I had a 503 error this morning, now my profile says there's nothing in my timeline. ๐Ÿ˜ข


It's really simple. If you don't want Reform to gain ground, then youโ€”yes, you! โ€”Need to start looking at the issues they're winning on and think of ways to satisfy the voting public. Do that, and Reform's pledge to do something about it will be weakened. Throwing your rattle out the pram while screaming "Fascists!" or "Nazis!" isn't working anymore and doesn't help solve the very real problems people are feeling and Reform is feeding off.
politico.eu/article/nigel-faraโ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.

in reply to dick_turpin

I love how people are going around saying: "But six votes, they won by six votes! It's not a massive victory."
๐Ÿง  "Erm, you do know Labour had a huge majority, don't you? Reform just pissed it away with their six votes." ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ


So I had our dog's anal glands expressed last night. The procedure literally takes two, maybe three minutes, and if you don't watch them, they try to use Hibiscrub as a lubricant! I wonder how they'd feel with soap up their backside?

ยฃ27.00 Pets at Home charges, and that's not even a vet; it's a nurse! Twenty-seven pounds to stick a finger in and waggle it about a bit. I phoned our local White Cross Vets; they want an eye-watering ยฃ47.00

It's no wonder dogs and cats are dumped everywhere. Nobody can afford them, what with the price of food, groomers and extortionate vet bills for the most simple of procedures.

gov.uk/government/news/cma-preโ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

I also will not stick my finger up your dog's bum for less than 100 quid. Probably not even then. ๐Ÿคข
in reply to dick_turpin

ยฃ27 for 5 minutes work is nearly 13 grand a month if you can keep the pipeline of dogs' arses full. I'm in the wrong business!


So, seven days ago, the papers carried a story that Sadiq Khan was to cut 1700 police officers. standard.co.uk/news/london/metโ€ฆ and yet today's news says Kier Starmer is to increase Police presence. ๐Ÿ˜•
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm244zโ€ฆ


Dear TV viewers.
Be very careful what the #BBCNEWS shows you with these PIP claimants being interviewed and saying how they don't know how they'll manage. ๐—ก๐—ข๐—•๐—ข๐——๐—ฌ has been assessed yet! So nobody knows who will lose what.
#MediaManipulation
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg5drvโ€ฆ


Not sure why everyone is getting their knickers in a twist over this. Obviously, bombing people needs discussing. What does need looking into is dumb arse Michael Waltz for inviting Jeffrey Goldberg to join the channel.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyd9eโ€ฆ


Dear Sir Kier Starmer

Please stop doing things that makes me want to vote for you at the next General Election!

NHS Shakeup
Welfare & Benefits Shakeup
Potholes
#Labour #Politics
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0eg39โ€ฆ



Looks like the money is starting to run out for all the Scottish freebies the SNP crowed about.
theguardian.com/education/2025โ€ฆ



๐—œ'๐—น๐—น ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ?
#politics
news.sky.com/story/ex-snp-chieโ€ฆ


So it's mainly PIP? Which, tbh, is riddled with abuse from what I've seen. Shaking up the #NHS and now scrutinising the benefits system. At this rate, I might have to start voting #Labour ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿคฏ
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyd2pโ€ฆ


Does anyone fancy paying ยฃ50 for missing an #NHS appointment?
Admittedly, these are Tory think tank suggestions, but it's got to happen. Getting rid of tiers of management isn't the ultimate answer.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/1โ€ฆ
#nhs


How the mighty have fallen.
#politics
telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/1โ€ฆ

Politics Channel reshared this.



You can't make this stuff up!

#Labour has spent the last fourteen years telling you that the #NHS is underfunded and understaffed. Screaming that there are not enough doctors and nurses, what do they plan to do now that they are in power? Take a scalpel to the NHS. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
theguardian.com/society/2025/mโ€ฆ

dick_turpin reshared this.

in reply to dick_turpin

itโ€™s focussed on the HQ, not the frontline. 15,000 administrators to be reduced to 7,500


Taking a leaf out of Elon Musk's DOGE book, I see?
"๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ง ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด, ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ-๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฌ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ณ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด."
#Politics #Labour
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly2l6โ€ฆ


So much for the Tories cutting benefits.
Remember children, you voted for em'.
#politics #Labour
news.sky.com/story/minister-paโ€ฆ
in reply to dick_turpin

It is good! It shifts the norm from the socialist idea that people don't have to care about anything, to the capitalist idea that people need to take responsibility for their own lives.

If this norm can become dominant, entrepreneurs will flourish in a generation and the UK will become an innovation center!

in reply to h4890

"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
in reply to dick_turpin

- said the slave.

Jokes aside... that is complete nonsense. Governments and states exist for the needs of their inhabitants. If they fulfill no need, they should be abolished.

Therefore any services or initiatives is entirely upon the maffia gang called "the state" and no shadow rests on the individual.

Personally, I moved from sweden, due to the revolting and highly unethical society it is (when it comes to taxation).

Now I pay about 9%-14% tax total. I am much hapier and

in reply to h4890

wealthier! I believe more people should vote with their feet.

That would lead to less polarized societies, more homogeneous societies and happier individuals.

High tax societies would attract people who enjoy paying high taxes, and low tax societies would attract people who do not want government services, and who enjoy paying low taxes.

Everyone happy in the end and no conflict! =)

in reply to dick_turpin

The problem with the UK is that nobody wants to pay taxes. They all believe there is this enormous body of '๐˜™๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฉ ๐˜—๐˜ฆ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ' who can supposedly be squeezed to pay these taxes for them, but more importantly, that it's the government's place to provide everything for the population free of charge.


๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—œ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ?

TBH, I could kick myself because I was already thinking yesterday morning, "I bet Trump stops sending weapons." If I had posted that thought on social media, I'd have beaten all the journalists to the scoop.

"๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฌ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ'๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ!"

telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202โ€ฆ



"๐˜Œ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜›๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ง......"

๐Ÿค” So, if it can defend itself, why does it need America's help?

Europe is fooling only the gullible if people think they stand a chance without US help. I wonder how brave Starmer would be if Trump announced a withdrawal from Europe.

British Army: Approximately 83,010 personnel
Royal Navy and Royal Marines: Approximately 32,610 personnel
Royal Air Force (RAF): Approximately 32,610 personnel

Just under 150,000 in total. Russia has just under 3 million personnel on active duty.

France has 290 Nukes, while the UK has 225, with a plan to reduce that to 180 by 2030

Russia has 5,580

france24.com/en/europe/2025030โ€ฆ

in reply to dick_turpin

Ok. That's clear. now Zelensky dared to express anti-Russian views so he almost invited Russia to invade. Got it.
in reply to andyc

Ahaha

Given that Ukraine has only been independent of Russia for 34 years, I'm reasonably confident that most Russians feel it is still part of their country. I didn't say that Putin was right to invade what I am saying is if you poke a dog with a stick, you should expect to be bitten.

The EU is just as guilty as Zelenskyy IMO. They should have known the shitstorm they were causing. It's incredible how:
Albania: Applied in 2009
Montenegro: Applied in 2008
North Macedonia: Applied in 2004
Serbia: Applied in 2009
Turkey: Applied in 1987

And the EU has dragged its feet, and yet when Ukraine applied, it was almost fast-tracked.

I don't really care if people hate Putin, or think he's a dictator or evil incarnate. Folk need to take a moment and look at it from the Russian point of view. This is an expansion towards Moscow as far as they are concerned.



๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ #Labour ๐— ๐—ฃ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ!
Where did I put my surprised face?

news.sky.com/story/mike-amesbuโ€ฆ



This proves that leaders are indeed a bunch of feckless kids.
European politicians, including Friedrich Merz of Germany, said that Europe needs to work towards independence from America politico.eu/article/friedrich-โ€ฆ and then next thing the UK's Kier Starmer says that Donald Trump, i.e. America needs to play a firm role in Europe. bbc.co.uk/news/live/c625ex282zโ€ฆ

What a bunch of headless chickens! ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ

in reply to dick_turpin

Surely that's why we "took back control", so we didn't have an EU army and centralised decision making?
This is literally Brexit delivering on its promises :-/ At least, it's Keir delivering on Brexiter's promises.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to dick_turpin

The problem with the UK, and I don't think it is 'Party' specific, is that we still think we have the standing and the strength to influence other countries like the Americans can, which means we are shocked when Europeans don't take any notice of what we say or do for that matter hence the reason we are bending over backwards for Ukraine in the vein hope someone in Europe says "Good old Briton, you can always rely on them." It's also amazing that we have been running our military into the ground for the last ninety years. Starmer's announcement has probably been the first increase in funding for decades.

Of course, nobody is saying: "Hang on a minute. I thought we had a ยฃ22 Billion black hole?
They're all a bunch of liars."

โ‡ง