There's a fundamental question that nobody is asking: Who runs the country? Am I seriously being told that all the state departments, the Foreign Office, the Home Office, the Treasury, etc. Are a law unto themselves? What does #Starmer actually do then?
#politics
newstatesman.com/politics/uk-p…
#politics
newstatesman.com/politics/uk-p…
Keir Starmer vs the civil service
The PM’s battle with Whitehall is a delayed reckoningEthan Croft (New Statesman)
Politics Channel reshared this.
Chris Ellis
in reply to dick_turpin • • •either way Starmer should go. He's either lied or completely incompetent.
I struggle to buy that an FCO civil-servant would make such a decision with out being pressured in advance, or consulting via an undocumented back channel.
And then after it all blew up. You'd have thought the PM might actually go and find out the details. To which it seems he trusted 'a process'. The guy really have no political sense.
Chris Ellis
in reply to Chris Ellis • • •it also feels like he running out of people to blame of it all too.
Can't wait for one of the people he's fires to turn around and stab him in the back.k
dick_turpin
in reply to Chris Ellis • •Chris Ellis
in reply to dick_turpin • • •yeh indeed, he's always got an excuse as to why it's someone else fault and they should get sacked.
It's utterly pathetic given he campaigned on being whiter-than-white and was going to fix things up.
He's wasted a big majority and parliamentary time, arresting OAPs for the terrorism offence of holding up a placard.
It seems mr integrity doesn't really have any.
dick_turpin
in reply to Chris Ellis • •Chris Ellis
in reply to dick_turpin • • •dick_turpin
in reply to Chris Ellis • •That definitely opens the door for ReformUK. I honestly cannot ever envisage the Green Party ever being in power. The Liberal Democrats, Who?
While it grieves me to admit it, I suspect the Conservatives will be a spent force until 2034 the only chance they have is a coelition in 2029 but the public will only allow them to be the junior partner.
Andy Wootton
in reply to dick_turpin • • •dick_turpin
in reply to Andy Wootton • •I saw something the other day alluding to some backroom deal that Starmer supposedly owed Mandleson, and that's why he gave him the job. The problem is, over the years, we have become so accustomed to that sort of thing that I tend to believe it.
The problem with this whole mess is that amateurs are in charge. Starmer’s attempt to offer up Olly Robbins as a sacrificial lamb has backfired. Now Downing Street intends to release hundreds of documents relating to Mandelson and his appointment, which I wouldn’t be surprised will put Starmer even deeper in trouble. If they can’t get Mandelson vetted right, what chance have they got of scrutinising the documents?
Andy Wootton
in reply to dick_turpin • • •dick_turpin
in reply to Andy Wootton • •Andy Wootton
in reply to dick_turpin • • •