West Midlands, United Kingdom
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
2024-11-23T09:54:18+00:00
- About:
This is an alternative account for dick_turpin@mastodon.org.uk
If you don't like the content, go follow some other account.
How're words offensive? And why should I have to tolerate YOUR interpretation? I'm the one using the word. ASK me how I'm using it, don't TELL me. And if you don't like the way I'm using it, so what? It's my right. It's my freedom of expression. Without that, we're nothing but slaves.
-- John Lydon AKA Johnny Rotten
--- The Sex Pistols
- Uid
-
3c038ccc-1463-85fd-f90d-c3f014481876
- Nickname
-
dick_turpin
- Full_name
-
dick_turpin
- Searchable
-
true
- First_name
-
dick_turpin
- Family_name
-
- Url
-
https://castlecannon.house/
- Photo
-
- Photo_medium
-
- Photo_small
-
Neil Darlow :gotosocial: :silverblue: :xmpp:
in reply to dick_turpin • • •dick_turpin likes this.
dick_turpin
in reply to dick_turpin • •Adam Dalliance
in reply to dick_turpin • • •I'm pretty outraged over it but not nearly as much as I was outraged over the Rwanda plan.
1) This is for convicted criminals who have already had due-process and court etc.
2) They get to come back after the sentence, it's only temporary.
3) It's not a different continent.
Would definitely be better to just pay to have enough prisons here, or maybe legalize protest and stop locking up innocent drug users.
dick_turpin
in reply to dick_turpin • •I thought the argument was that this was no way to treat human beings?
Anyone whose asylum claim was successful could've "Come back".
Not sure what the continent has to do with it? A flight is a flight regardless of the destination. A room is a room regardless of where it is.
The whole point of the Rwanda deal wasn't anything to do with shipping people out there; it was to scare the shit out of people to stop them coming. Three or four flights and the government would have been able to suspend the transfers. 🤷♂️
Adam Dalliance
in reply to dick_turpin • • •Nope, that wasn't the policy. The policy was announced as "process them abroad" but when written was "process them as refugees there, to stay there or go back where they came from"
It was indeed designed and sold as a deterrent, which can't possibly work because refugees fleeing war in Afghanistan don't even know the immigration policy of the UK, they barely even know Only Fools And Horses.
I think distance does matter, but not enough to argue over. I was thinking more of the psychological distance for the victim of the government-sponsored human-traficking, rather than fuel costs.
It's all deplorable, but "serve your sentence abroad" is overall better than "we transfer your asylum application to the other side of the world you are never welcome here again"
dick_turpin
in reply to Adam Dalliance • •See, that is the greatest lie of the 21st century. While some of the initial countries, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, and possibly even Turkey, might be a bit dangerous for them, you can't possibly believe Hungary, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, and France or Germany, Belgium, and France are not "Safe Countries" for a fleeing Afghan?
I watched a programme the other day documenting how numerous towns across Italy are welcoming migrants in the hope of reanimating dead towns and villages. Yet, thousands ignore that option and race for Calais.
While many migrants may have family in the UK, that doesn't mean they get an automatic right to come here. It is obvious why Britain is the destination of choice. I wonder what would happen if the welfare state was abolished?
Adam Dalliance
in reply to dick_turpin • • •I didn't say anything about the safety of those countries.
Are you under the impression that there's some international rule saying people fleeing war have to stop at the first safe place they come to?
That rule doesn't exist, and it would be madness if it did, forcing the fleeing population to bunch up on the borders instead of spreading out around the world.
Scotland also wants immigrants, the UK is in dire need of immigrants because the population is old and retiring.
Most immigrants don't pick the UK, and those that do usually do so because of the language I suspect. That and Only Fools And Horses.
If they are under the impression we have a particularly generous welfare state they soon find they are mistaken.