As of March 2026, the #Labour government is significantly off track to meet its manifesto target of building 1.5 million new homes in England by the end of this Parliament (estimated August 2029). To hit 1.5 million homes over five years, the government needs to deliver an average of 300,000 homes per year (approximately 811 per day).

Total Delivered: Approximately 309,600 net additional homes were delivered between the start of the Parliament (9 July 2024) and 11 January 2026.

Shortfall to Date: By early November 2025, the government should have built roughly 396,000 homes to stay on track, representing a deficit of over 120,000 homes just in the first 16 months.

Daily Rate: The current delivery rate is roughly 564 homes per day, well below the required 811. GOV.UK
#politics

It's like the General Belgrano all over again.

𝘏𝘦𝘨𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘞𝘦𝘥𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘜𝘚 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘯 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 "𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘸𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴".

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0e55g…

US sub sinks Iranian warship in Indian Ocean, Hegseth says

Sri Lanka's navy says around 140 people are feared missing after a military vessel went down off its southern coast.

^{Yogita Limaye (BBC News)}

Hey, look, I'm a dumbass, what would I know? But I find it interesting that all the news outlets, and especially the BBC, are ramming it down our throats that while Donald Trump spoke for two hours, TWO HOURS! According to them, he said nothing of value? I even read a BBC fact-checker that debunked much of what he said about fuel prices, etc.

The thing is, I watched a lot of it LIVE, and I watched both sides of the Senate stand and applaud him and not just once either! So that tells this dumbass that a lot of what he said struck a chord with senators across the political spectrum and not just his party faithful.

We need to be careful what the press, TV and social media tell us. Remember, folks, they, too, have their own agenda, and we've seen numerous court cases where it turns out that maybe journalists and editors are not your guardians with your best interests at heart after all.

𝗜𝗳 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗜 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗠𝗣

Mr Speaker. The highest position in the land, before his majesty, the king, is Prime Minister. The holder of that position is entrusted by his majesty to not only serve the people but also to guide and ensure their well-being while shielding them from harm. The office of the Prime Minister carries significant responsibility and power. It is the Prime Minister's responsibility to ensure that the people are represented by honourable and competent individuals. The ultimate responsibility for prestigious appointments rests with the Prime Minister, who is accountable not only to this House but also to the British public. The buck stops here!

Mr Speaker, sadly, I call upon the House to censure the Prime Minister and call for a vote of "No Confidence" to be invoked.

That was jolly nice of Sweeney to take the bullet for Kier Starmer, wasn't it?

Ask yourself, who made the ultimate decision? I think it was the man that has "𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲!" on his desk.
politico.eu/article/top-starme…

Top Starmer aide Morgan McSweeney resigns over Peter Mandelson scandal

The British prime minister has been under pressure since revelations about Mandelson’s relationship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

^{Mason Boycott-Owen (POLITICO)}

How on earth can ANY of Epstein's victims gain justice? What, money? Is that the answer? Give people a few quid, and that's justice? Justice is tracking down everyone who participated in or facilitated his activities, and I mean everyone, even those who offered up their friends or other girls to him and his fellow pedos, because that, in my opinion, is the worst betrayal.

It was a mistake to let him die because now he will never suffer, unlike his victims.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5dq…

Newspaper headlines: 'Mandelson under fire' and 'Bring justice for Epstein victims'

Lord Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor facing fresh accusations amid latest Epstein files release leads Monday's papers.

^{BBC News}

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀!
Customer sends me a requirement email and yet still phones "for a chat". Mulling over the request, he adds a monitor to his original request. I go ahead and order his stuff, including the monitor. This morning I opened his PO, and there's no monitor. I email him, and he rings:

𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿: "Ah, I wanted to try the monitor we have."
𝗠𝗲: "I know, you said that, but you also said you still needed a monitor."
𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿: "Yeah, I was thinking I might need another PC, so I would need a monitor."
𝗠𝗲: "You never mentioned a PC?"
𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿: "Yeah."
𝗠𝗲: "I've ordered it now."
𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿: "Hmm? OK."

𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽!

Once or twice, I've told the story of a fairly well-known customer of ours, in which the Director, walking through the factory, stopped at one of the workers' machines and said, "You know about computers, don't you?" The worker responded, "Yeah, I build 'em on the weekend." The director promptly made him head of IT for a multi-million-pound company.

The other day, I mentioned a PA at another big customer was either pushed or jumped. She was the main point of contact for a group of about 15 companies, submitting support tickets to us and approving or resolving any requests for work requiring payment. This morning, there is an email in my inbox introducing the new point of contact and asking for our help and understanding as they take on this new (secondary to their own) role. This person works in the design department. 🤦‍♂️